Other Sex Offender News: State and National
Our Commenting Policy ---///--- Our Blog Tips
Court says UNCONSTITUTIONAL:Missouri
Voting Rights: Approved ---- Denied -///- Voting Problems
Facility Law Libraries --/-- Phone Restrictions
Showing posts with label (Key-Decision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label (Key-Decision. Show all posts

State v Phillips


4-4-2013 Florida:

State v Phillips
No. SC11-411.

This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in In re Commitment of Larry Phillips, 69 So.3d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). In its decision the district court ruled upon the following question, which the court has certified to be of great public importance:
DOES THE STATE HAVE JURISDICTION TO INITIATE CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE INVOLUNTARY CIVIL COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS ACT AGAINST AN INMATE WHO IS ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE RELEASE BASED ON A CORRECTED AWARD OF GAIN TIME?
Id. at 956. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We hold that because Phillips' sentence had expired at the time the State initiated commitment proceedings under the Jimmy Ryce Act, Phillips was not in lawful custody, and consequently, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the commitment petition. Accordingly, we answer the certified question in the negative, and approve the Second District's decision rendered below.

... ... ...

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, we hold that Phillips was not in lawful custody at the time the commitment procedures were initiated under the Act because his incarcerative sentence had already expired. Therefore, we answer the certified question in the negative, and approve of the Second District's decision rendered below. It is so ordered.