Other Sex Offender News: State and National
Our Commenting Policy ---///--- Our Blog Tips
Court says UNCONSTITUTIONAL:Missouri
Voting Rights: Approved ---- Denied -///- Voting Problems
Facility Law Libraries --/-- Phone Restrictions

Sex offender program might be constitutional after all


11-30-2013 Minnesota:

Attorney General Swanson, in a recent Star-Tribune commentary on the commitment of sex offenders, makes some important points.

The possible change of status of a committed offender has led to her requesting a court hearing, which should have been done initially. The offender petitioned for the change a year ago and was denied, based on the opinion of experts and his victims; however, when he petitioned again this year, his request was on track to be granted without any additional input from the evaluators or the victims.

Why? Some have suggested it was an attempt to show that offenders do get released from the state's civil commitment program. This would be consistent with the belief that a federal court is about to declare Minnesota's program unconstitutional.

Swanson, however, emphasized that the court won't necessarily rule against the state program's constitutionality — if it is properly administered.

My opinion is that there are forces that have seized on the constitutional challenge as a method of forcing amendment of the statute that has successfully protected the public from these offenders for 20-plus years.

Recent "sky is falling" comments from legislators and others are raising fears that the court might suddenly turn multiple offenders loose, but such suggestions are not respectful of the wisdom of the court. There really are two sides to this issue, and both deserve to be heard. ..Source.. by Ray Schmitz, Attorney

Sex offenders can't read local newspapers


11-29-2013 Minnesota:

Media policy updated in August to name newspapers

ST. PETER — Sex offenders in Minnesota can order and read any newspaper they choose, except for The Free Press, the St. Peter Herald and the Moose Lake Star Gazette.

The Minnesota Sex Offender Program banned local newspapers from their facilities in St. Peter and Moose Lake in 2007, and updated the policy in August to specifically name the forbidden papers, said Nancy Johnston, the program’s executive director.

An inmate in Moose Lake mailed The Free Press a copy of the media policy with a short letter complaining about it.

Johnston said the policy was put in place to protect staff members and their families. For example, an inmate could read about a staff member’s child becoming an Eagle Scout.

Local newspapers could also print maps that could aid an inmate’s escape attempt, Johnston said.

She said the policy was not put in place because of a specific event but was an attempt to reduce the risk of one occurring. The August update of the policy was likewise not in response to anything specific.

She said she’s not sure what the inmates think about the policy; she hasn’t received any complaints about it.

Local newspapers are allowed in the state’s prison system, a Department of Corrections spokesperson said. ..Source.. by Dan Linehan

Serial sex offender's escape draws attention to unique Texas law


11-28-2013 Texas:

A serial rapist who was captured in Oklahoma after taking off from a Dallas halfway house will likely go back to prison for a very long time.

Robert Grunsfeld remains jailed in Oklahoma, but will soon be transferred to Dallas County and charged with violation of a civil commitment – a third degree felony.

He'll also likely be tried as a "habitual offender," which could send him back to prison for 99 years.

His case and his escape have drawn attention to a unique Texas law designed to keep sexual predators who have completed their sentences off the streets.

Grunsfeld, 51, was convicted in a series of violent rapes in 1989.

A state psychologist described an increasing violent pattern of "sexually sadistic behavior."

His original life sentence was overturned on appeal. Instead, he got 20 years. He was deemed too dangerous to release and transferred to a halfway house, the Dallas Transition Center, under what's called a "civil commitment."

There are 225 men housed in the privately run facility, but most are parolees. Only a dozen, like Grunsfeld, are there under civil commitments.

Texas Most Wanted Sex Offender Caught In Oklahoma


11-27-2013 Texas:

A Texas top 10 most wanted sex offender has been caught, days after he cut his ankle bracelet and ran away from a Dallas halfway house.

Robert Grunsfeld, 51, removed his ankle monitor on Friday and was caught on Monday in McAlester, Oklahoma.

Authorities from the Pittsburg County Sheriff’s Office arrested Grunsfeld at a fast food restaurant at about 5 PM.

Grunsfeld has been convicted of six counts of sexual assault, three counts of carrying a prohibited weapon, burglary and fraud.

He had been sentenced to live at a halfway house as part of the civil commitment program.

A $3,000 reward was offered for tips leading to Grunsfeld’s arrest, but this arrest was not the result of a tip.

Grunsfeld is now being held in Oklahoma. ..Source.. by CBSDFW.COM

9 Investigates repeat sex offenders


11-26-2013 Florida:

The state of Florida has more than 600 sex offenders locked up in its civil commitment facility in Acadia, and many will never leave.

In 1999, Florida enacted the Jimmy Ryce Law, named after the boy was abducted, raped and killed near his Miami-area home.

The law requires the state to review all sex offenders prior to their release from prison. If the state determines that the sex offender still poses a danger, a civil hearing will take place in which the prisoner can be civilly committed, essentially keeping inmates behind bars long after their time served for their crime has ended.

“It’s on the release point they say, 'Uh, oh. Can we let this guy out? Is he going to be dangerous?'” said 9th Judicial Circuit Public Defender Robert Wesley. "Criminal law says you can’t be punished for the same crime twice, so we put a new suit of clothes on it and call it civil and say we’re trying to help a person get better.”

The program is designed to keep the worst of the worst behind bars, but testimony before state leaders in Tallahassee reveals more than 500 sex offenders have been reviewed as part of the Jimmy Ryce Law, cleared and subsequently reoffended.

Eyewitness News reviewed more than 5,000 sex offender cases in the central Florida area, discovering dozens of cases where the offender was reviewed by the state, released and reoffended. (1.2% re-offended).

ABC 6 Investigates: Minnesota Sex Offender Program Part 2


11-26-2013 Minnesota:

(ABC 6 News) -- It's a story we have been following for months, the future of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program.

Even though the men and women in the treatment program have served their prison sentences, they claim they are still locked up.

Now its up to lawmakers or a federal judge to decide their fate.

In Part 2 of our investigation, as state officials work on finding a solution, another voice is asking to be heard as well.

Victims.

"I understand the choices and the crimes we committed are horrible," says Jeff a so called "client" inside the treatment program.

Jeff is a level three sex offender currently in his third year of commitment into the Minnesota Sex Offender Program.

He was sent to Moose Lake after sexual assault and public masturbation charges.

"I saw a few females and I had an urge to expose," he says.

He is currently in a class action lawsuit brought on by the nearly 700 sex offenders suing the Department of Human Services.

Governor Mark Dayton recently directed the Department of Human Services to halt the releases of sex offenders until changes can be made to the program.

ABC 6 Investigates: Minnesota Sex Offender Program Part 1


11-18-2013 Minnesota:

ABC 6 News) -- Minnesota's Sex Offender Treatment Program continues to be the center of huge debate.

Minnesota's Senate Judiciary Committee met Monday to discuss the program and says action needs to be taken next year or risk a federal judge doing it for them.

Just last week Governor Mark Dayton directed the Department of Human Services to stop releasing sex offenders from the program until the legislature can make changes to the program.

Problem is -- time is running out.

Jeff is a so called "client" inside Minnesota's Sex Offender Treatment Program in Moose Lake, Minnesota.

He was committed nearly three years ago and if history proves to be true, he could be in the program a long time.

"Some two to three years like me, some ten to fifteen years," says Jeff, "and theres just no light at the end of the tunnel."

Those "inside the wire" are frustrated because they say a treatment program is supposed to have an end date.

Nearly 700 clients are in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, so far only one has been released.

Our View: Sex offender program shouldn't be campaign fodder


11-26-2013 Minnesota:

Elected officials can and often do survive sex scandals. Sure, they pay a price in embarrassment and humiliation and might see an interruption in their career, but after a period of public penitence and private fence-mending, there's often light at the end of the tunnel.

But pity the politician who gets a reputation for being "soft on sex offenders." That's a label that, when printed in large type on an opponents' campaign literature, can be a game-changer. No one runs commercials saying "He's a bad husband," but foes won't hesitate to say, "He put rapists back on the streets."

So, we understand Minnesota legislators' obvious lack of enthusiasm for reforming the state's civil commitment system for sex offenders, even as it's facing a challenge on constitutional grounds. Furthermore, we realize that Gov. Mark Dayton had little choice but to publicly declare that every one of the state's 690 civilly committed sex offenders will stay behind bars until the Legislature figures out how to reform the system.

After all, when Dayton didn't oppose the possible release of convicted rapist Thomas Duvall — who has been civilly committed for more than two decades — he faced immediate (and entirely predictable) backlash from one of his likely foes in the 2014 gubernatorial race.

That criticism, from Rep. Kurt Zellers, may have been at least partly politically motivated, but it was well-justified nevertheless. Given Duvall's lengthy history of violent, brutal sexual assaults on at least 60 women and girls — some as young as 14 — he's not the guy we'd choose to demonstrate that people can actually complete the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and re-enter society. Regardless of what the Legislature does or does not do next year, we suspect (and hope) Duvall will remain under lock and key for a long, long time.

Still, it's worth noting that not every offender in Moose Lake and St. Peter has a record like Duvall's. More than 50, in fact, have no adult convictions on their records. Even more have developmental disabilities and/or are elderly and thus would be unlikely to re-offend if they were housed in less-restrictive, less-expensive environments.
Note: Before assuming that those non-adults should not be here, folks must know what it takes for a younger person to be prosecuted as an adult. See 609.055 CAPABILITY OF CHILDREN TO COMMIT CRIME. and for other offenses see Legal Age in Minnesota both of which are legislative links.

It is not impossible for younger folks to commit horrendous type crimes which if we knew what the crimes of these 50 were, might very well explain why they have been civilly committed. It is also possible that the 50 are not SVPs but persons held in civil commitment for mental health reasons. See HERE. They may just be held in the same hospital but not mixed with SVPs, this Editorial is not clear on this point.
But again, no one — especially politicians — want to be seen as having opened the doors to release sex offenders. That's why reforms to the MSOP have been so slow to happen, even as U.S. District Court Judge Donovan Frank prepares to hear arguments Dec. 18 that the system is inhumane, inadequate and unconstitutional. More than a dozen MSOP "patients" are plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit, and there's every indication their claims have some merit.

Barring the unlikely event that Frank shuts down the MSOP outright (or says it's fine as is), we see no way for the DFL-led Legislature to avoid this issue next year. MSOP has no track record of successful treatment, is incredibly costly and puts judges in impossible positions when considering the possible civil commitment of young sex offenders who have served their criminal sentences.

The system is bursting at the seams, and something's gotta give.

So the DFL will have to bear down and get the job done next spring, even if it is distasteful and difficult. It's entirely possible that some legislators will pay a political price for their efforts when the 2014 elections roll around.

We hope, however, that leaders in the Republican caucus will recognize that this issue goes beyond politics. Indeed, the best reforms for the civil commitment system would be achieved through bipartisan efforts, with both parties having some "ownership" of the MSOP reforms — which are unlikely to be popular among the voting public.

People tend to like the "throw away the key" approach for sex offenders, constitutionality notwithstanding, but Minnesotans should prepare themselves for the likelihood that this method won't survive for another year. ..Editorial.. Of PostBulletin

KS: Sexual Predator Treatment Program broken, crowded, ineffective, lawmakers say


12-12-2012 Kansas:

OSAWATOMIE — A pair of Kansas legislative committees have called for an audit of the state’s controversial Sexual Predator Treatment Program at Larned State Hospital, saying the program is crowded and ineffective.

Republicans Carolyn McGinn, chair of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, and Marc Rhoades, chair of the House Appropriations Committee, expressed concern over the expanding population of sexual predators living at Larned. The program has grown from a mere 16 in 1998 to more than 200 in recent years, pushing the facility to near capacity.

Yet since its creation in 1994, only three offenders have successfully completed the treatment program to be released back into society, Rhoades said. The rest either fail to move through each step of the program, or refuse to participate. Convicted sex offenders who have completed their prison sentences can be civilly committed to the program if a judge deems them a continuing threat to the community, but they cannot be forced to undergo treatment. Rhoades said “it’s kind of like a hotel.”
“Those that are finally convicted and end up going to these very restricted facilities, their chances of getting out is not a very high percentage,” McGinn said.

The Kansas Sexual Predator Treatment Program is charged with rehabilitating sex offenders who have served their prison sentences but are committed by the courts because they still pose a danger to society. The hospital must accept whomever the courts commit to the program, and treatment focuses on therapy and work assignments geared at making an offender ready to re-enter society. The program is designed to be completed in about seven years, resulting in release.

Rhoades said it’s a bit fatalistic to assume offenders’ only way out is in a casket, which is why both committees are urging auditors to not only scrutinize treatment issues in Larned, but to analyze best practices from similar programs to help reshape the state’s plan.

But Angela de Rocha, communications director for the Kansas Department for Children and Families, said it’s not the program’s fault; it’s the offenders’.

“There’s two groups of people out there: there’s the people who are young and who want to receive treatment and help, and then there’s everybody else who’s kind of happy with the way they are,” de Rocha said.

But despite the call for accountability and efficiency, state auditors say they can’t even consider the audit request until March. Deputy Post Auditor Justin Stowe said the Legislative Division of Post Audit has a full schedule of audits, and it will not be able to take on more until next year.

Auditors estimate it will take three staff members up to five months to research issues of effectiveness of treatment, staff and offender safety, and managing the growing program population.

But it’s that last problem, the growing number of people committed to the program, which could prove most difficult.

For Rhoades, managing the program’s population means a combination of improving treatment to release offenders — though he said it’s not always a popular option — as well as being more prudent in committing individuals who have served their time.

“There needs to be some common sense, too, that they really are a sexual predator intending harm,” Rhoades said.

Last year the state spent about $12.8 million funding the treatment program at Larned, up from $7.5 million in 2005.

The Sexual Predator Treatment Program was last audited in 2005, and a motion to conduct another audit was defeated by legislators in 2008.  ..Source.. by Travis Perry

State report shows safety, security problems in sexual predator treatment program


9-11-2013 Kansas:

Topeka — A state audit of the sexual predator treatment program at Larned State Hospital found problems that could affect the safety and security of staff and offenders.

“Quite frankly, I think this facility is a disaster waiting to happen,” said state Sen. Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka.

The report released Wednesday depicted an understaffed facility manned by overworked employees. Under these conditions, some safety and security precautions have been overlooked and need to be improved, the audit said.

During a meeting of the Legislative Post Audit Committee, state officials said staffing levels at Larned were improving, and that many of the audit’s recommendations were being implemented.

But Eldon Dillingham, of Wamego, whose son is in the treatment program, said the employee issues were much worse than the administration let on.

“Morale is zero down there,” Dillingham said.

Established in 1994, the program provides treatment for sex offenders who have completed their prison sentences but have been determined by the courts to be sexual predators in need of involuntary treatment. Some within the program have complained that the commitment is the equivalent of a life sentence since only three people have ever completed the program while 22 have died while under commitment.

As of April, there were 219 residents in the sexual predator treatment program at Larned, and seven at Osawatomie State Hospital.

KDHE investigates complaints at Sexual Predator Treatment Program


8-18-2012 Kansas:

TOPEKA — A crew of Kansas Department of Health and Environment inspectors spent much of this week investigating complaints filed by patients in the state’s Sexual Predator Treatment Program at Larned State Hospital.

The eight surveyors arrived at the hospital Monday and departed Thursday, according to KDHE officials.

Tim Keck, deputy chief counsel at KDHE, said the complaints were considered “routine” and were unrelated to an earlier survey that cited the hospital for not having enough nurses and for not doing enough to ensure that medications were safely dispensed.

Keck said the inspection also was unrelated to the recent death of Robert Boatright, a 57-year-old patient in the Sexual Predator Treatment Program.

The earlier survey, completed in March by The Joint Commission, turned up problems that would put the hospital’s accreditation – and potentially $14.5 million in federal aid – in jeopardy if not corrected by the time surveyors return.

According to the Joint Commission report, 27 percent of the hospital’s registered nurse positions and 44 percent of the licensed practical nurse positions were vacant.

Because of staffing shortages, hospital officials have acknowledged that nurses and direct care workers often are required to work 12- and 16-hour shifts.

The Joint Commission is a national organization that accredits hospitals. Its surveyors are expected to return for an unannounced inspection by Sept. 27.

Keck said KDHE policies called for an annual inspection of the Sexual Predator Treatment Program’s overall operations. He said the department also tries to conduct an annual review of patient complaints.

Keck said his office sent surveyors to the Sexual Predator Treatment Program this week after realizing the complaints, none of which were considered “major,” had not been reviewed “for a number of years.”

“This is a population that makes complaints on a regular basis,” he said. “We’re really not in a position to respond to every complaint every time one is filed, but we do try to look into them once a year. When we found out that hadn’t happened in a while, we arranged to have some inspectors go out there. It needs to be done.”


Keck said complaints that are considered “major” are subject to a “much quicker” review process.

Most of the complaints now under review, he said, involved purported lack of cleanliness and other housekeeping issues.

Keck said the survey’s findings would be made public, noting that “if there’s a problem,” KDHE would request corrective action.

Historically, the Sexual Predator Treatment Program, launched in 1994, has had its facilities licensed through KDHE. Until this year, the program was run by the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services. It’s now administered by the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services.

Keck said The Joint Commission survey was limited to the hospital’s inpatient psychiatric unit and did not involve the Sexual Predator Treatment Program.

Rick Cagan, executive director with the Kansas Chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, said his office had received several calls about conditions at both the hospital and the Sexual Predator Treatment Program.

“I think it’s pretty clear the hospital has a big HR (Human Resources) problem and morale is really low because they’re so understaffed and people are having to put in so much overtime,” Cagan said. “There are just a ton of health and safety issues that need to be addressed. The place is a time bomb.”

Last month, KDADS announced that starting pay for the hospital’s registered nurses had been increased from $23.31 to $29.73 an hour in an effort to attract and retain nurses.

Since then, the hospital has put a single office in charge of coordinating nursing schedules throughout the hospital. Before, each unit handled its own scheduling.

“We went live on the 6th of August,” said Thomas Kinlen, the hospital’s interim superintendent. “There are definitely some growing pains, but we’re working on them, we’re listening to our nursing staff. We’re trying make it so they can focus more on patient care and not so much on managing schedules.”

The hospital’s licensed practical nurses are represented by the Kansas Organization of State Employees, a labor union.

“Right now, the ‘master scheduler’ is a mess,” said KOSE Executive Director Mike Marvin. “But they’ve been talking with us about it, and it looks like once they get the bugs worked out it’ll be better.”

Marvin said KOSE and KDADS were negotiating a pay raise for the hospital’s licensed practical nurses. He declined further comment.

A man who has been a patient in the Sexual Predator Treatment Program for the past 13 years said Boatright died shortly after being taken to the emergency room at Pawnee Valley Community Hospital in Larned.

The man, whose name is withheld here at the request of state officials, said complaints from patients about conditions at the hospital have long been ignored.

“This place is an absolute disaster,” he said. “It’s a zoo. But you know what? The public doesn’t care. KDHE isn’t going to do anything; The Joint Commission isn’t going to do anything. Nobody cares. I don’t know why they don’t just give us all the death penalty.”

Kinlen and other state officials declined comment on Boatright’s death.
..Source.. by Dave Ranney

Coalinga hospital inmate sentenced for child porn possession


11-23-2013 California:

A 63-year-old man from Los Angeles was sentenced to 25 years to life in state prison for possession of child pornography in the Coalinga State Hospital, the Fresno County District Attorney's office said Friday.

Ronald Rudd was found guilty on Nov. 12 of watching child pornography in his room using a hard drive hooked up to a computer monitor. He was in the state hospital because he was determined to be a sexually violent predator.

Rudd has three prior convictions for child molestation in 1989 and will not be eligible for parole for a minimum of 21 years and three months. ..Source.. by Jacob Rayburn

Minnesota sex offender rights


11-22-2013 Minnesota:

Moose Lake, MN (NNCNOW.com) - Nicholas Luhmann and Thomas Bolter say they're in love and want to get married. They know they've done some terrible things in their lives but believe they've paid the price and are working on their problems with sexual deviancy.

"He doesn't reinforce or pursue that type of behavior anymore," said Luhmann.

"I no longer think by myself or about myself because that is what got me here and if I chose that route I would be violent," said Bolter.

Luhmann, who is now 30 years old, has a history of sexual offenses beginning when he was just 10 years old when he sexually abused his four year old brother.

He would go on to assault several other children and adults, even sexually assaulting another inmate while in prison.

"I think it was just a lack of people skills," Luhmann said. "Low self-esteem and trying to get needs met in the wrong way."

Federal agency threatens to pull certification for Arizona State Hospital


11-21-2013 Arizona:

PHOENIX — A federal agency is threatening to revoke the certification of the Arizona State Hospital, saying it found violations of regulations dealing with patient rights and nursing services.

In a letter to hospital chief executive Donna Noriega, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said deficiencies inspectors identified in a September visit “substantially limit the hospital's capacity to render adequate care to patients or are of such character as to adversely affect patient health and safety.” Ruth Arther, manager of survey, certifications and enforcement for the agency's non-long term care division, said her agency is immediately removing the hospital's status as a provider considered meeting requirements to participate in — and get reimbursed — by Medicare and Medicaid.

Arther said if sufficient corrections are not made, Medicare payments will cease on Feb. 12. Those federal dollars make up about a fifth of the $30 million budget for the hospital's civil commitment unit.

Both CMS and the Department of Health Services say the actual inspection report detailing the problems is not subject to public review until January.

Health Director Will Humble said the inspectors — who actually are health department employees — did find various instances where procedures were not followed and patients were injured. But he said that, in some of the cases, procedures were followed but hospital personnel failed to document what they had done.


Humble said he intends to send a corrective plan to the federal agency today.

The report is drawing particular scrutiny by Gov. Jan Brewer. Aside from being the state's chief executive, she has a particular interest in what goes on at the facility: One of her sons, Ronald, has been a patient in a different unit of the state hospital for more than 20 years after being found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 1989 sexual assault of a woman.

But the governor, after being briefed by Humble, told Capitol Media Services she is confident that patients in the facility are safe.

“If the policy is followed, and it is documented, there should not be a problem,” Brewer said. “They're just as safe there as they would be anywhere else.”

The investigation is the direct outgrowth of a report by the Phoenix ABC affiliate about a patient death in September. The Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Office says the man died of complications of having swallowed multiple “foreign bodies.”

That led CMS to require state inspectors, under contract to the federal agency, to take a closer look.

Cory Nelson, the health department's chief of behavioral health services, said the report found no instances of abuse. But what it did find, he said, were situations which affected “a patient's ability to be in a safe environment.”

“The hospital works with people that have the most challenging set of illnesses and the symptoms associated with that,” he said. “We have individuals out there who have very serious self-harm issues.”

He said protocols require that some of the people be monitored closely — one staffer to one patient — with direct visual contact and at a distance of no more than six feet, but Nelson said investigators found six instances where that did not occur.

And in several of those, patients were able to harm themselves by doing things like swallowing foreign objects or using items — or even their own nails — to cut themselves.

Inspectors also found situations where there was not the level of staffing that the hospital itself had said was necessary. Nelson said while some of that was lack of documentation, there also were situations where someone did not show up at work.


Brewer said she will continue to keep a close eye on the situation.

“My ultimate goal is that the hospital is run securely and obviously very safe for patients,” she said.

The inspection was only of the civil commitment unit of the hospital. It houses 120 patients, virtually all of whom were sent there under court order because they were found to be a danger to themselves or others.

A separate 120-patient unit is reserved for those who essentially have been found “guilty but insane,” people who would otherwise be behind bars except for their mental condition.

A third unit, with between 80 and 90 patients, houses those who have served their time in prison for violent sexual offenses but are considered too dangerous to be allowed back on the streets. ..Source.. by Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services

See further comments by a patient here


Governor suspends plan to move sex offender clients to Cambridge


11-21-2013 Minnesota:

At the end of this article is the full letter Gov. Dayton sent to Minnesota Department of Human Services Commissioner Lucinda Jesson.

Cambridge Mayor Marlys Palmer admits she felt a little better Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 13, upon learning Gov. Mark Dayton suspended the plans by the Minnesota Sex Offender Program to transfer clients to a facility in Cambridge.

In a letter addressed to Minnesota Department of Human Services Commissioner Lucinda Jesson, Dayton suspended the department’s plans to transfer any sexual predators to other tightly supervised facilities, such as in Cambridge, until certain conditions have been met.

The Minnesota Sex Offender Program has said it’s currently supporting petitions of 12 intellectually disabled clients to transfer to the Cambridge site housed at the Minnesota Speciality Health System-Cambridge Campus.

The MSOP provides comprehensive services to individuals who have been court-ordered to receive sex offender treatment. Most MSOP clients have completed prison sentences. Clients are civilly committed by the courts and placed in treatment for an indeterminate period of time. A court may commit a person to MSOP to ensure public safety if a judge determines that the individual is a “sexual psychopathic personality” or a “sexually dangerous person,” or both.

Nancy Johnston, executive director of the MSOP, has explained as part of a legal settlement agreement, the Cambridge facility has been working to move clients into more integrated community settings. At the same time, the Department of Human Services has been working to develop alternative placements for MSOP clients who can be served safely in settings that are secure but less restrictive than the facilities at Moose Lake and St. Peter.

Swanson: Why I stepped in on sexual sadist's release


11-20-2013 Minnesota:

Facts should be heard before the state discharges a sexual sadist.

I  believe that the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP), if properly administered, meets the scrutiny demanded by the U.S. Constitution. I also believe that an evidentiary hearing should be conducted before serial rapist Thomas Duvall is discharged from MSOP. It is wrong for commentators to suggest either that Duvall’s discharge makes MSOP constitutional or that his unsuitability for discharge makes the program unconstitutional (“Kicking the can on sex offender release,” editorial, Nov. 17).

The courts have concluded that dangerous sex offenders can constitutionally be committed to protect public safety. As the Minnesota Supreme Court held: “Even when treatment is problematic, and it often is, the State’s interest in the safety of others is no less legitimate and compelling.” The courts recognize that treatment will not necessarily be successful for every patient.

MSOP is a program under which sexual psychopaths and dangerous offenders are civilly committed to a secure facility for treatment. Almost every patient has already served time in prison for sex offenses, and many have committed dozens of acts of sexual violence. In every case, the patient has been determined by a court to have a mental illness, disorder or dysfunction that renders the person highly likely to engage in future acts of harmful sexual conduct. MSOP costs $120,000 per patient/per year.

Out of 700 patients — many of whom are elderly or low functioning — MSOP supports Duvall as one of the first candidates for discharge. I was contacted by one of Duvall’s victims after she called an assistant county attorney to question Duvall’s fitness for release. She told me that the assistant county attorney disregarded her, told her that Duvall’s discharge was a “done deal,” and that she had no voice in the matter. What I found when I looked into the situation was troubling.

Minnesota senators: Sex offender program needs change


11-19-2013 Minnesota:

UPDATE: Judiciary Committee Chairman Ron Latz urged quick action to avoid an embarrassing legal finding that the state is unconstitutionally detaining some former sex offenders who have completed their prison sentences.

The chairman of the Senate's judiciary panel warned today that if Minnesota lawmakers don't reform the state's imperiled sex offender treatment program in their upcoming session, a judge may do it for them.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Ron Latz urged quick action to avoid an embarrassing legal finding that the state is unconstitutionally detaining some former sex offenders who have completed their prison sentences. Other lawmakers raised an even more primal fear: that such a ruling could result in the sudden release of sex offenders whom the state has kept in custody for years out of concern they still represent a threat.

There are currently 690 people in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, most of them indefinitely committed to treatment in Moose Lake and St. Peter after finishing prison terms. In the program's 19-year history, only one person has been released from custody, and U.S. Magistrate Judge Arthur Boylan has told state officials to change the program or risk being ordered to do so.

A Guest Editorial from ATSA Executive Director, Maia Christopher


11-18-2013 Florida:

Recent media reports have questioned the effectiveness of Florida's sexual offender civil commitment (SOCC) program, which allows for the preventive detention of particularly high risk sexual offenders following completion of their prison terms so that they may complete treatment in a secure facility before returning to the community.

The consequences of sexual offenses can be devastating, and it is understandable that lawmakers, victims and their families, and members of the public seek expedient solutions. In reality, however, preventing sexual abuse is a complex issue. When news media call into question current sexual offender management practices, it is important that members of the community have sufficient information to understand the issues.

The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA, and its Florida chapter FATSA) is an international, multi-disciplinary membership organization dedicated to preventing sexual abuse. Our members are researchers, clinicians, law enforcement professionals, and victim advocates. ATSA members have contributed to the development of treatment and risk management strategies that reduce reoffending. We also work to promote social policies that will increase community safety and ensure that services are available to victims and their families.

ATSA recognizes that the reoffenses highlighted by the Sun Sentinel were truly tragic, and that discussions about recidivism rates and risk assessment ring hollow in the wake of a heinous crime. Any victim is one too many.

Over the last 30 years, we have learned a lot about the dynamics of sexual assault. Most victims are abused by someone they know and trust. We also know that not all sexual offenders pose the same degree of risk to the community. Civil commitment is designed for those at highest risk.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states with SOCC statutes must adhere to specific criteria, and individuals may be civilly committed only when (1) they can be diagnosed as having a mental disorder predisposing them to sexual violence, and (2) they are "likely to reoffend" according to a psychological risk assessment. The court emphasized that SOCC requires thoughtful consideration of the need to balance public safety with offender civil liberties, and that quality treatment is what distinguishes civil commitment from incarceration.

Since 1999, over 30,000 incarcerated offenders have been assessed for possible civil commitment in Florida, and over 700 are currently detained. A recent independent review of the program found that of the sexual offenders released to the community, 95% have not been rearrested for a new sex crime. The risk assessment procedures used in Florida are grounded in research to ensure the highest degree of accuracy; however, these methods are not foolproof. Nonetheless, evidence based assessment, treatment, and community reintegration strategies for offenders are vital in our efforts to ensure community safety.

As compelling as it may seem, the simple answer of “locking them all up” would be in violation of the Supreme Court’s rulings. Such a practice would also direct crucial resources away sexual abuse prevention efforts, as well as treatment services for victims.

So, what should we do? First, we must ensure that research guides us in identifying those at highest risk to reoffend. Second, we must target resources toward those most likely to reoffend. Third, we must ensure that sexual offenders returning to the community have both accountability and effective treatment services. This requires close collaboration between law enforcement, probation and parole, victim advocates, and sexual offender treatment providers.

ATSA members are committed to making society safer. In addition to sexual offender risk management, we believe that lawmakers must make it a priority to prevent sexual abuse from occurring in the first place, to ensure the availability of effective and compassionate services to victims, to facilitate effective child protection programs, and to provide prevention services to at-risk families. No More Victims is our shared goal.

For additional information sexual offenders and sexual violence prevention, visit www.atsa.com. ..Source..

GPS Ankle Bracelets Now Have the Ability to Listen and Record Conversations


The number of violations here is amazing, just think of all the personal moments a person has and the state is listening in on ALL of it. See Also: Caution: Your GPS Ankle Bracelet Is Listening where they mention the name of the company "SecureAlert" and their website is under maintenance, guess they don't want folks to know what their product does.

UPDATE: This company is also tracking folks in Civil Commitment see: SecureAlert, Inc. Subsidiary to Provide Sex Offender Patient Tracking for Minnesota Sex Offender Program at Moose Lake, Minnesota


11-18-2013 Puerto Rico:

An update on the creeping surveillance state: An alarming report out of Puerto Rico finds that an ankle bracelet given to suspects out on bail or parole may have the ability to listen to and record conversations.

A Corrections Department agent, who works at the Puerto Rico Pretrial Services Office’s monitoring center for defendants free on bail, placed a GPS ankle bracelet on the court podium and made a call from the device to a technician of the SecureAlert company, which provides them at a facility in Sandy, Utah.

The technician, who was addressed through the GPS ankle bracelet–which has a phone feature–testified that, although the device is supposed to vibrate when activated from Utah, the feature could be turned on without warning . . .

. . .the discovery has raised serious questions about whether such technology violates the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship–and the right to privacy–for thousands of individuals under court supervision across the U.S. whose personal private conversations could be heard or recorded without their knowledge and without a court warrant.

Remarkably, it appears that this technology was put into the bracelets on the sly. Defense attorneys and civil liberties advocates who work with criminal suspects and parolees were unaware of the recording/eavesdropping capability.

Victor A. Meléndez-Lugo, Director for the Appeals Division for the Puerto Rico Legal Aid Society, said that he has not heard of any similar case and found the possibility “shocking”.

“The recording or interception of phone calls in Puerto Rico constitutes a crime”, Meléndez-Lugo added. “If that is happening in Puerto Rico it has to stop happening since yesterday.”

Ben Wizner, Senior Staff Attorney for the ACLU in Washington, D. C. said it was the first time he had heard of such a case, adding that “if it allows eavesdropping or to record conversations, (it) is a very important issue that is worth exploring.”

And of course, if someone is listening in, it’s not just a violation of the rights of the suspect or parolee, but of everyone else who is a party to the conversation. ..Source..

10 years after UND student’s murder, Dru Sjodin's mother and others remember


See also: State doctor who evaluated Rodriguez may be removed from job

11-17-2013 Minnesota:

Linda Walker lives alone now in her house on the shore of Clamshell Lake, with Izzy, a Black Lab-Golden Retriever mix. It’s been 10 years since her daughter, Dru Sjodin, was abducted from the parking lot of Grand Forks’ Columbia Mall by convicted sex offender Alfonso Rodriguez, assaulted and killed.

PEQUOT LAKES, Minn. — Linda Walker lives alone now in her house on the shore of Clamshell Lake, with Izzy, a Black Lab-Golden Retriever mix.

It’s been 10 years since her daughter, Dru Sjodin, was abducted from the parking lot of Grand Forks’ Columbia Mall by convicted sex offender Alfonso Rodriguez, assaulted and killed.

Walker’s life has changed, of course, in ways she couldn’t control but perhaps more important, in ways she is directing.

The grief and loss still are here but Walker has a steely resolve evident in her eyes when she talks about promises she made to her daughter and about keeping them.

It began here by the lake the day of Dru’s funeral in April 2004, after her body was finally found in a ravine near Crookston as the snow was melting. Linda had the Cadillac carrying Dru’s body detour on the way to the cemetery to come down this driveway one last time to her home, to the lake she loved.

“I promised to bring her home,” Walker said.

She is still keeping promises, dedicating her time to doing what she doesn’t really enjoy: public speaking, lobbying politicians, attending court hearings and talking to reporters.

“I just wanted to ensure that what happened to Dru wasn’t going to happen to other people,” Walker said last week.

Dru’s father, Allan Sjodin, also consistently has said for 10 years that his daughter’s memory and spirit keep pushing him to make sure she gets justice and that she is not forgotten. He lives near Park Rapids, Minn., with his life Linda.

Ruben Rosario: Sex-offender civil commitments bring out worst in politicians


11-17-2013 Minnesota:

Sex offenders, the modern-day lepers of society and a politician's favorite whipping boy, are back in the news.

We're talking about Minnesota's almost 700 men and one woman civilly committed after most served their prison sentences and were deemed too dangerous to be released from secure prison-like state treatment facilities in Moose Lake and St. Peter. Detainees include about 50 who were civilly committed as juveniles but never convicted of crimes as an adult.

In what could turn out to be violations of their constitutional rights, they are essentially serving life sentences without parole
. That was supposedly never the intent of civil commitment laws, but that's how it's playing out here. In nearly two decades since the program began, only one sex offender has been conditionally released. Minnesota is the nation's leader in indefinitely detaining such offenders after they have completed their prison terms.

As a survivor of childhood sex abuse, I can say that I detest these types of criminals and offenders. I know what these predators rob from their victims. But another thing I detest is political grandstanding.

Gov. Mark Dayton was right when he called the latest flap a "political circus" after Minnesota Rep. Kurt Zellers, a former House speaker and a 2014 Republican gubernatorial hopeful, blasted him for not opposing a decision to conditionally release a serial rapist from Moose Lake to a less restrictive environment. He called Dayton's stand "insensitive" to the feelings of the rapist's numerous victims.

Mother of sexual assault victim will stop at nothing to protect children


11-16-2013 Florida:

FLORIDA -- In the months since the tragic death of Cherish Periwinkle, there has been much attention focused on violent sexual predators - and the system that sometimes fails to keep them from re-offending.

One mother says she had to take justice in to her own hands after her son was raped.

"I went online and posed as a 14-year-old little boy," said Judy Cornett.

The mother of a sexual assault victim, she says she will stop at nothing to keep children safe.

"This guy was living at the wrong address, this guy was living at the wrong address. This is Kevin Kinder. The one who took my son," she says, pointing out mug shots.

Authorities want 1990s Mooseheart pedophile committed after prison release


11-13-2013 Illinois:

The attorney general's office wants a man who was convicted of sexually assaulting and abusing six boys at Mooseheart in the 1990s committed to a state facility as a sexually violent person.

Chad E. Wahl, now 44 and formerly of Pekin, was scheduled to be released from prison Friday, but has been transferred to a state detention center until a hearing later this month in Kane County.

Wahl was arrested in March 1992, fired from his job, convicted and sentenced to 21 years in prison in early 1994.

At the time, prosecutors argued that Wahl, then 24, got a job as a "house parent" in October 1990 at the facility for troubled youths near Batavia, according to court records.

Wahl started a "reward program" to allow boys to sleep on a living room floor on Fridays and Saturdays and watch movies.

"Much of the abuse took place during those 'reward periods,' " prosecutors wrote in a 1994 sentencing memo, noting Wahl showered his victims with gifts and told them not to tell anyone because no one would believe them.

All the victims were younger than 13; the youngest was 9.

Under a 1998 state law, a person can be committed to the state's Department of Human Services after a prison term if the inmate has committed a sex crime, has been diagnosed with a mental disorder, and a jury decides it's "substantially probable" the person will commit another sex crime.

A licensed clinical psychologist, Melissa Weldon-Padera, interviewed Wahl Sept. 19 and concluded he is a pedophile who was likely to reoffend.

In court documents, Weldon-Padera noted that Wahl had refused sex offender treatment in prison, denied being sexually abused by his father when he had admitted it in previous investigations and in personal letters written from prison, and gave "correct" or "textbook" answers to make it appear he was a lower risk to reoffend.

"His parole plans are indicative of this (Machiavellian) trait in that he alludes to setting up a business to produce and distribute child pornography while never overtly stating these are his plans, thus giving him deniability," Weldon-Padera wrote.

If a Kane County judge rules Nov. 26 that there is "probable cause," Wahl will be detained until a jury trial is held.

Since the law went into effect, the attorney general's office has had more than 330 people committed to the Rushville, Ill., Treatment and Detention Facility until they are deemed fit to re-enter society. ..Source.. by Harry Hitzeman

Gov Dayton wants sex offender releases halted for now


11-13-2013 Minnesota:

Saying an established process had succumbed to politicization, Gov. Mark Dayton on Wednesday ordered his administration to oppose future provisional releases of sex offenders until the Legislature has time to change Minnesota's legally embattled treatment program.

The change in course was conveyed in a letter to Human Services Commissioner Lucinda Jesson and later explained by Dayton at a news conference. It comes days after a GOP gubernatorial hopeful accused the Democrat of putting public safety at risk, raising the likelihood it'll become an election issue next year.

"It was just made clear that this was an issue that would be seized upon and abused by some who don't mind scaring the people of Minnesota for their own advantage," Dayton said. "We just can't proceed in that environment."

Dayton's decision won't affect three discharge appeals currently in the court pipeline, including one from convicted rapist Thomas Duvall. His case drew renewed attention to the potential of indefinitely committed sex offenders moving back into the community with close supervision. Dayton and his administration allowed Duvall's appeal to go forward despite objection from victims and Attorney General Lori Swanson, a fellow Democrat.

The policy of opposing future applications for supervised release, he said, will be frozen while the Legislature considers program changes in the 2014 session. Dayton is also suspending the planned transfer of some lesser-risk sex offenders to a residential facility in Cambridge.

State officials are facing pressure in a federal lawsuit to end the practice of unlimited treatment terms for patients in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program. There's a chance the entire program could be invalidated — and those in it set free — on grounds it amounts to a backdoor life sentence.

The 698 people in the program have been civilly committed in secure facilities after completing prison terms and are receiving treatment. The treatment is supposed to lead to eventual reintroduction into society, but only one offender has been released. The state has currently capacity for 789 offenders at once, meaning space concerns could become paramount.

Dayton has backed Jesson in her decision not to fight the release of Duvall.

Duvall, 58, was convicted three times of sexually assaulting teenage girls. He served time in prison for the offenses dating to the 1970s and 1980s. He has been civilly committed to treatment since 1991, and earlier this year a Department of Human Services panel recommended his supervised discharge. Jesson did not oppose the recommendation, but said Duvall should undergo examination by a specialist, which is scheduled for January.

A three-judge panel has agreed to hold an evidentiary hearing on Duvall's case, likely in April.

Dayton said if it were up to him, Duvall and similar offenders "should never walk free. But that's not what the law says right now and our responsibility as public officials is to uphold the law or change it."

Last week, state Rep. Kurt Zellers of Maple Grove, a Republican candidate for governor, called for Duvall's continued detainment. Zellers reiterated that call Wednesday and said the governor hasn't gone far enough.

Rep. Brian Johnson, R-Cambridge, said the decision regarding the suspended transfer of offenders to a facility in his community was welcome news after months of "unanswered questions and growing concern."

What happens next is difficult to predict given the sensitivity of the topic and a looming election. The state Senate approved a bill last session to modify the sex offender program, calling for an intensive supervision and treatment program for any offenders who are provisionally released and a public awareness campaign. It also seeks more regular review of offenders who remain committed to assess whether they are making progress.

State Sen. Kathy Sheran, DFL-Mankato, said she hopes the House will take the same action to reduce legal vulnerability.

"With nearly 700 persons there, we have to create evidence to the courts that this is really a treatment system and not incarceration," she said.

House Speaker Paul Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis, said he has approached Republicans about seeking a bipartisan solution, as the GOP has indicated openness to. ..Source.. by BRIAN BAKST

South County officials oppose sex predator's release


11-13-2013 California:

In a pre-emptive move, two South County officials spoke out Tuesday against the pending release of a sexually violent predator, saying they do not want him placed in any of the communities they represent.

It remains unclear where Douglas Badger, a 70-year-old repeat sex offender, might be allowed to live after his release from a state mental hospital now that a proposal to place him in rural East County has been rescinded.

But state Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez and county Supervisor Greg Cox aren’t waiting to find out. They said at a news conference that Badger should not be released at all, given his history of attacking young men and a 16-year-old girl.

Only a handful of sexually violent predators have been released in San Diego County since legal changes went into effect that allowed those considered the worst offenders to be committed civilly to state hospitals after they served their time in prison. One offender remains under supervision in the community.

Minnesota sex offender with 'homicidal rage towards women' could be released


11-10-2013 Minnesota:

MINNEAPOLIS (KMSP) - Thomas Duvall would be only the second person released from the Minnesota Sex Offender Program in more than 20 years and the federal courts say you can't give a life sentence to someone who's already done their prison time.

Hennepin County prosecutor George Widseth has put away his share of sex offenders, but today he was in the unusual position of asking for one's release.

"Yeah, he's got a tremendous history. They all have tremendous history, long awful history," Widseth said.

Duvall is one of 698 sex offenders who've done their criminal time, and are now considered patients, civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program in St. Peter and Moose Lake.

"If they're treating people they have to be released," Widseth said.

That's what the federal courts say, too, but attorney general Lori Swanson is seeking to block Duvall's release, her attorneys asked a three-judge panel Friday for a hearing to see if he's still a threat to the public.

DARK HISTORY

Duvall's rap sheet goes back to 35 years, when he raped a 17-year-old girl he met at the State Fair.

1981: Five months after his release, he forced a woman into his car at knife point.

1984: Three days after his release from prison, he assaulted a 15-year-old girl on her way to school. Later that day he assaulted two other girls at gunpoint.

1987: 12 days after his release from prison for those crimes, he raped a 17-year old girl and beat her with a hammer.


PANEL: A 'HOMICIDAL RAGE TOWARDS WOMEN'

Two psychologists who reviewed his case last year said he was highly likely to re-offend, that he had a "homicidal rage towards women," and may actually have anywhere from 60 to 200 victims. And yet, he also meets all the criteria for release.

It's also about politics. Governor Dayton is siding with the Department of Human Services, in not objecting to Duvall's release, but former house speaker Kurt Zellers is opposing his release in a letter to the court that says he's concerned the release may be imminent and a done deal.

The three-judge panel set aside the second week in April to have a hearing on whether Duvall is still a threat to the public. Three psychologists will examine Duvall and testify about his risk level. There's no argument about his past, the arguments will be about what he's like today. ..Source.. by Tom Lyden

Judge’s decision in sexual predator case sparks controversy


Trial Court Decision
3-3-2013 Florida:

After Juan F. Vega completed 25 years in prison for a series of violent rapes and kidnappings, Miami-Dade jurors were asked to decide whether he posed a danger to society if released.

Their decision surprised courthouse observers: Let him go, they said earlier this month. Vega should not be confined to a locked-down therapy center for sexual predators.

What happened next was equally surprising: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Migna Sanchez-Llorens disregarded their decision and ordered Vega into indefinite civil confinement anyway, drawing howls of protest from defense attorneys.


Sanchez-Llorens’ decision is believed to be the first time in Florida that a judge had sent a convicted sex predator into civil confinement over a jury’s verdict. The unique legal battle, bound to be settled at a higher court, has rekindled debate over the Florida law that allows sexual predators to be detained indefinitely after their prison terms.

“To consider overturning the finding of this verdict just to keep Juan Vega in is an insult,” defense lawyer Andrew Rier told the judge, adding later: “Are we really going to say that our desire to keep Vega in is more important than following the rights of the jury in Dade County?”

But after listening to psychologists who deemed him a risk to re-offend if released, the judge said, “There is no reasonable evidence upon which a jury could rule in favor” of Vega.

The evidence “points to but one possible conclusion: that [Vega] is a sexually violent predator,” Sanchez-Llorens wrote in her order.

For now, Vega remains at the Florida Civil Commitment Center in Arcadia, as lawyers meet Monday for another hearing.

Vega, 49, was committed under the 1998 Jimmy Ryce Act, a law that allows for the indefinite detention of sexual predators deemed too dangerous to be allowed back into society after serving their prison term.

The law was named after 9-year-old Jimmy Ryce, who was kidnapped, raped and killed in South Miami-Dade in 1995.

Currently, there are 569 people in civil confinement, with an additional 97 awaiting their trials, according to state figures.

The process works like this:

When a convict is near finishing a prison term for a sexual offense, the Florida Department of Children & Families evaluates the person and recommends to prosecutors whether he or she should be committed to civil confinement.

After release, the convict is placed in Arcadia pending a trial, considered civil. They are not considered “defendants” but “respondents,” and are never housed in a jail.

At trial, jurors must find “by clear and convincing evidence” that the person is a sexually violent predator. Verdicts must be unanimous. If the jury is hung but a majority wants the convict committed to the therapy center, then a mistrial is declared and prosecutors can seek a new trial.

A standard jury instruction tells jurors that if there is a 3-3 split — as is what happened in Vega’s case — it automatically results in the person being released from the commitment center.

‘PSEUDO-SCIENCE’

Critics have long maintained that the law unfairly punishes those who have already paid their debt to society, and allows prosecutors to use “pseudo-science” to predict future crimes.

“Jurors tend to be sympathetic to the state. Why risk having an individual out who might recidivate when they may be treated — allegedly?” asked John Selden, a Daytona Beach assistant public defender who handles Ryce cases.

The success rate for prosecutors is very high. During the past three years, 307 convicts have been committed under the Ryce Act, with 20 in Miami-Dade and Broward counties, according to DCF statistics.

In that same time period, only 26 convicts statewide were released after winning at trial. That includes six in Broward and one in Miami-Dade.

Attorney Jack Fleischman, of West Palm Beach, said he has won at least five Ryce cases and nearly all of the clients have remained trouble free, and some have thrived.

BACKFIRED

Others have not fared well. The most high-profile: In 1999, rapist Marlin Leach became the first person tried under the Ryce Act in Palm Beach. Jurors decided he should not be committed.

But in 2008, Leach, now 41, broke into a Riviera Beach home and kidnapped and raped a woman. He is now serving a life sentence in prison.

Also in 2008, jurors refused to commit door-to-door salesman Marcus T. Davis after he finished an 11-year prison sentence for sexually assaulting a Fort Myers woman. After he moved to Georgia, police said Davis tried to rape his sister’s friend.

Jurors acquitted him at trial. Later, when allegations arose that he molested a young girl, police arrested him for failing to register as a sex offender.

He’s now doing two years in prison, scheduled for release next year.

Other times, released convicts return to prison on technical probation violations.

In 2007, jurors declined to send convicted child molester Eddie Lee Sadler, of East Naples, to the commitment center. Three months later, Sadler was returned to prison after he violated his parole for being away from home past curfew.

Robert Sazone, a convicted child molester released from confinement by a jury, was sent back to prison for 10 years after he helped his mother string up Christmas lights at her home. The house, it turned out, doubled as a part-time school — a violation of his probation.

As for Vega, Miami-Dade police said that in the early 1980s, he plucked women — between the ages of 15 and 28 — off the streets or bus stops, raping them in isolated wooded areas.

Vega was arrested in 1985 after a Miami-Dade detective, while interviewing a victim at the crime scene, spotted the man’s red truck drive by. In all, prosecutors said he was linked to attacks on six women. He pleaded guilty and agreed to a 30-year term, of which he did 25 years.

At the two-week-long civil trial, prosecutors said Vega tried to escape prison custody three times, once successfully. And three psychologists, in testimony and reports, said Vega suffers from mental disorders, including “sexual sadism” and a personality disorder.

His attorneys and a defense psychologist insisted that the state’s inexact science could not predict that Vega would re-offend if he were let out.

‘UNPRECEDENTED’

The judge ordered Vega committed on a “directed verdict” requested by prosecutors.

Gene Zenobi, the head of Miami’s publicly funded Regional Counsel defense office, said the judge’s decision flies in the face of rules crafted over the years with the help of committees of lawyers on both sides.

“I have trouble accepting that a judge can unilaterally circumvent the rules laid out by the Supreme Court,” said Zenobi, who is not involved in the case. “What she did was rather unprecedented.”

Vega will appeal the judge’s decision. But prosecutors say the judge made the right call.

“It was a wise choice,” Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said. “She sided with the public. She wasn’t going to put kids at risk.” ..Source.. by DAVID OVALLE

On Special Assignment: Additional costs


2-27-2013 Wisconsin:

Sex offenders on supervised release rack up bills

Wisconsin's Department of Health Services pays top dollar on several homes around the state in rent. But rent isn't the only cost to taxpayers.

In most cases DHS reports its rental properties are each housing one sex offender on supervised release from the Sand Ridge Treatment facility in Mauston.

We're talking about $1,600 for one rental house in Manitowoc when larger homes nearby rent for as low as $400.

Or a house in Green Bay being rented by the state with your taxpayer dollars for $2,500, also four to five times above the going rate.

Some taxpayers we talked to are outraged.

"It's a lot of money, that's a lot of money," said one neighbor.

"That's crazy, I got a two bedroom apartment for $410," said another about the Green Bay property.

Taxpayers pick up the rent cost because these sex offenders are still the responsibility of Sand Ridge and the Department of Health Services. If the sex offender has money he is required to contribute to the cost. But out of the 28 currently on supervised release, only one according to program officials is paying his way.

That is what frustrates taxpayers.

"All of them have to be provided yes, and that's why they say it's costing us then to do that in that way. Is that the way we should be doing it? And at such cost?" asked Richard Kunz, a neighbor of the home being rented in Manitowoc.

And the $550,000 in rental costs a year is just the start of it. Sand Ridge officials confirmed to me by email that taxpayers also pay for a lot more. But before they could provide specific costs on camera, Sand Ridge officials backed out of an interview--declining further comment. But I obtained a document sent by a Sand Ridge official from last year detailing the annual costs then.

It shows nearly $13,000 for phone service--needed to contact the clients and for electronic monitoring, and $30,000 for utilities--covering gas, heat and electricity.

Lawn care and snow removal racked up $19,000 in costs since leaving the house is restricted. Taxpayers paid for $9,000 for food.

That's in addition to sex offender treatment in the community of $339,000 and $956,000 for a hired company to monitor the sex offenders and chaperone them to where they need to go in their communities.

With other miscellaneous costs and the rent added in the total cost for those on supervised release comes to $1.9 million. The amount the sex offenders are contributing to their costs of care--$69,000.

"This is an open ended story and we're only in the middle of the book," said State Senator Michael Ellis, president of the Senate.

Ellis was shocked when we showed him what taxpayers were paying to rent homes for those on supervised release.

Ellis figured the state could save millions over ten years simply by buying rental properties. But he says there's another option to consider.

"Option two would be to eliminate the release program. The supervised release program, just get rid of it, and expand Sand Ridge," said Ellis.

Ellis acknowledges there are legal issues and state statutes that need to be reviewed in addition to the costs of the program, but he's sure taxpayer money can be saved. ..Source.. by Mark Leland

State pays high rent for sex offenders


2-27-2013 Wisconsin:

MANITOWOC - Dozens of sex offenders on supervised release from the state are being put up in state-paid rental properties, and some of those rents are way above the going rate.

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services oversees the sex offenders on supervised release from the state's Sand Ridge Treatment Facility in Mauston. Currently, there are 28 sex offenders in the supervised release program.

One of those offenders is put up in a 480-square-foot home in Manitowoc. And while neighbors in larger homes report paying $400 to $600 a month in rent, the state is paying $1,600 a month in rent to house the sex offender on supervised release.

The sex offender, who were not identifying, was placed in the Manitowoc home in November of 2010, and since then has cost the state - meaning taxpayers - over $40,000 in rent alone.That's more than home sold for three month before the tenant moved in.

Neighbors aren't happy about a sex offender in their neighborhood - or the fact it's costing them money every month.

"We thought it was outrageous at $1,500 and then it went to $1,600, and it's putting it mildly that it's outrageous," said Richard Kunz, who lives down the street.

And this isn't the only rental property commanding huge payments, according to DHS records. A Sand Ridge official indicates landlords are able to charge a premium based in part on the difficulty the state has in securing rental properties for sex offenders in the supervised release program.

FOX 11 brought the cost figures to State Sen. Michael Ellis (R-Neenah), who was shocked at the expense.

"Well I know it sounds ridiculous, it does, but we're going to look into it and I know we can save money," said Ellis, president of the state Senate. ..Source.. by Mark Leland

Lawmakers ask for sex offender rent audit


UPDATE 3-20: Hearing set on sex offender housing costs
3-5-2013 Wisconsin:

We have a follow up to our On Special Assignment story last week on the high rents being paid by the state to house sex offenders on supervised release.

Two state legislators from Northeast Wisconsin are asking for an audit of the costs to house these sex offenders in rental properties around the state.

An On Special Assignment investigation by FOX 11's Mark Leland showed the state renting 28 homes for $550,000 a year.

In some cases the state is paying rent at four, even five, times the going rate.

An official with the Department of Health Services acknowledged the state pays a premium to rent some of the homes because it is hard to find landlords willing to house sex offenders.

Tuesday, State Senators Michael Ellis of Neenah and Joseph Leibham of Sheboygan were set to meet with auditors from the Legislative Audit Bureau to review the cost concerns.

State Senator Robert Cowles of Allouez heads up the legislative committee that would make the formal request to review the costs of the supervised release program. ..Source.. by Mark Leland

Prosecutors try to halt sex offender's release

11-9-2013 California:

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A rapist who has served half of a 50-year sentence for a series of San Diego attacks could be freed unless prosecutors convince a court that he's too dangerous.

Prosecutors said Friday that Alvin Ray Quarles is a violent predator who should be committed to a state hospital indefinitely.

Quarles was scheduled to be released Nov. 16. However, a judge Friday set a Dec. 19 hearing on whether to release him or send him to a hospital until it's determined he's no longer a public threat. Quarles will remain in custody until that hearing.

An email message to reach Quarles' public defender Friday was not immediately returned.

During attacks in the 1980s, Quarles assaulted women at knifepoint, sometimes forcing their husbands or boyfriends to watch. He pleaded guilty in 1989 to four counts of rape, and to robbery and burglary.

Before the law was changed in 1994, the most serious offenders were entitled to credit of up to 50 percent of their sentence for good conduct, District attorney spokesman Steve Walker said. The law now limits violent felons from receiving more than a 15 percent reduction from good-time credits.

Should the court determine that Quarles qualifies as a sexually violent predator, he will be committed to a state hospital for sex offender treatment and held until he is determined to no longer be a threat.

"We're working closely with the victims in this case who deserve the peace of mind that this convicted rapist won't be able to harm anyone in the future," Walker said. ..Source.. by SFGate.com